X [1992] ECR I-131 - Case C-373/90 - MCAD.
- "misleading" comparative advertising.
- parallel imports
- misleading by omission.
1) not misleading to describe a previously registered, but never used, car as "new"
unless a "significant number of consumers" would be deterred if knew of registration.
2) "cheaper" misleading if "significant number of consumers" unaware of specification.
3) "guaranteed" not a false or misleading claim if true.
undefined: unpaid
Related case digests
- R v Ford Motor Co Ltd [1974] 3 All ER 489 - Ss 1(1) and 3(1)TDA.
1) implied description "new". 2) meaning of "new" - false to a "material degree"?