You are not currently signed in - enter your email address and password into the boxes below, or create a new account.

R v Black [2020] EWCA Crim 915 – S 34 CJPOA.

- inferences from D’s failure to mention fact at interview, relied on in his defence.
1) relevant circumstances affecting what D could reasonably be expected to mention at interview include his legal advice.
- court not concerned with correctness of legal advice, but advice given to D very relevant circumstance to take into account.
2) inferences should only be drawn under s 34 CJPOA if P’s case, at time of interview, so strong to justify answer.

undefined: unpaid

Legislation