Hicks v Grewal (1985) 4 Tr L 92 - Ss 23 and 24 TDA.
- due diligence.
- no evidence given.
- wrong to acquit on unsworn statement as proof of statutory defence.
undefined: unpaid
You are not currently signed in - enter your email address and password into the boxes below, or create a new account.
- due diligence.
- no evidence given.
- wrong to acquit on unsworn statement as proof of statutory defence.
undefined: unpaid