Jemmison v Priddle [1972] 1 QB 489 - (R 12 MCR – r 7.3 CrimPR).
- information alleging two acts, but only one activity, was not bad for duplicity.
undefined: unpaid
Related case digests
- Carrington Carr Ltd v Leicestershire County Council (1994) 158 JP 570 - S 46 CCA - (r 12 MCA – r 7 CrimPR).
- consumer credit advertisements - duplicity. 1) not duplicity to allege a single advertisement to be misleading in a number of ways. - review of the five situations covered by the authorities on duplicity. 2) surveyors fees and legal fees were a “liability” to make a payment. 3) words in regulation requiring “at least” certain specified information to be provided in an advertisements mean that substantial compliance is insufficient. 4) advertisement, which held out that taking advantage of a scheme would make someone better off, made a comparative reference.