Newham (London Borough of) v Singh and Sandhu (1988) 152 JP 239 - Ss 1 and 4 TDA.
- disclaimer not apt defence to s 1(1)(a) charge, but can show description not being used.
- applying and using - effect of disclaimer.
undefined: unpaid
Related case digests
- R v Southwood [1987] 1 WLR 1361 CA - S 1(1)(a) TDA.
- disclaimer by falsifier. 1) disclaimer not open as defence to charge under s 1(1)(a). 2) s 24 defence not open to falsifier. 3) disclaimer apt under s 1(1)(b) if purchaser put in same state of knowledge as D. 4) clocking to zero not effective disclaimer - irrelevant that no one likely to be misled.