You are not currently signed in - enter your email address and password into the boxes below, or create a new account.

R v T [2005] EWCA Crim 3511 - S 20 TDA.

- consent and connivance or neglect of director.
1) s 3(1) IA - sufficiency of indictment (or, r 100(1) MCR, information) (now r 7.2 CrimPR).
2) rule against duplicity is to ensure D not misled or uncertain as to charge he faces:
- it is to be applied in a practical, not strictly analytical, way.

undefined: unpaid

Legislation