R v Kousar [2009] EWCA Crim 139 - S 92(1)(c) TMA.
- "possession custody or control".
1) one spouse is not in possession of the other spouse's personal property.
2) a person who permits property to be in their house does not thereby possess it.
3) ability to exercise control over property does not equate to actual control.
4) the "possession custody or control" has to be "in the course of a business".
undefined: unpaid
Related case digests
- Bellerby v Carle [1983] 2 AC 101 - S 17 WMA.
- unjust weighing equipment. - "in his possession" imports at least some degree of control over the equipment.