R v Sullivan [2015] EWCA Crim 1565 – Ss 98 and 101(1)(d) CJA 2003.
- bad character.
1) D’s experience of committing a particular crime not generally “to do with the alleged facts of the offence with which the defendant is charged”.
2) evidence of D’s previous involvement in cannabis production may be “relevant to an important matter in issue between the defendant and the prosecution”
3) when bad character evidence is given, the jury should be given assistance as to its relevance.
undefined: unpaid