You are not currently signed in - enter your email address and password into the boxes below, or create a new account.

Begum and Begum v Luton Borough Council [2018] EWHC 1044 (Admin) – S 127(1) MCA – rr 2.2, 4.2- 4.4, 4.11 and 7.2 CrimPR.

- danger of not laying information until end of time limit.
- date of service of an information is date handed to “court officer with authority to accept it” – r 4.3(1)(e).
- court security officer did not have authority to accept an information.
- leaving information with security officer at magistrates’ court was good service under r 4.4, but date of service was business day after day on which left – r 4.11(2)(a).

undefined: unpaid

Legislation