R v Armstrong [2018] EWCA Crim 2363 – Ss 1 and 3 FA – reg 11 CPUTR – regs 10 and 19 CCICACR – s 34 CJPOA.
– inference.
1) offence under ss1 and 3 FA required P to prove D aware he under a legal duty.
– but, P not required to prove specific knowledge of legislation imposing the duty.
- the required knowledge could be inferred.
- inference that trader aware of legislation in force for considerable time.
2) identity of D can be inferred from circumstantial evidence including inference drawn from D’s failure to answer questions when interviewed.
undefined: unpaid