R v Byrne, R v Creaven and another, R v Raja, R v Moore and others [2021] EWCA Crim 107 -experts.
1) competence of witness to be an expert may derive from experience alone without formal qualifications.
2) party calling expert witness must ensure expert understands and discharges obligations to court.
– duty of expert to give objective and unbiased opinion.
3) evidence of inappropriate expert at trial does not necessarily make conviction unsafe.
undefined: unpaid
Related case digests
- R v Pabon [2018] EWCA Crim 420 – R 19.2 CrimPR (duty of expert) – s 2(1) CApA.
1) witness, including expert, not to discuss evidence whilst still in witness box. - expert witness must be more than “enthusiastic amateur”. - expert witness must not give opinion on matters beyond area of expertise. - experts should be chosen to be of suitable calibre. 2) conviction may be safe, notwithstanding failings of P’s expert witness, where relevant issue unaffected by expert’s evidence.