Jones v Thomas [1987] RTR 111 - R 100 MCR - (para 7.2 CrimPR 2005) – s 6(1)(b) RTA.
1) failure to specify paragraph number of subsection under which charge brought did not render information defective when there could be no confusion caused thereby.
2) reference to criminal provision in an information as “as amended” when provision was actually not amendment but substitution of new provision did not render information defective when incapable of misleading either layman or lawyer.
3) more apt for P to have alleged new provision had been substituted rather than refer to amendment.
undefined: unpaid