www.consumercrime.co.uk

You are not currently signed in - enter your email address and password into the boxes below, or create a new account.

• Home
• About CCC
• CCC Search Tips
• Keyword list
• Articles
• New Older Cases
• Cases referred to
• Abbreviations
• Legislation Links
• Organisation Links
• Contact us
• Your account

Hicks v Sullam Ltd (1983) 147 JP 493 - Ss 23 and 24 TDA.

- reliance on verbal assurances.
- precaution taken after offence might reasonably have been taken before.

undefined: unpaid

Related case digests

• Gale v Dixon Stores Group Ltd (1993) 101 ITSA MR 20 - S 24 TDA.
  - "new". - diligence - precaution taken after offence might reasonably have been taken before.

Legislation

• Trade Descriptions Act 1968