R v Williams and Bellchambers [2011] EWCA Crim 474 – (TMA).
1) contributory inference of guilt could be drawn from lack of incriminating evidence in D’s possession, when D had time to destroy it, but weight of inference was for jury on the facts.
2) evidence that D knew goods were counterfeit may be circumstantial and derived from several strands looked at cumulatively.
3) sentencing - when starting point of five years imprisonment not even arguably too high for counterfeiting conspiracy.
undefined: unpaid