R v Walters [2020] EWCA Crim 894 – S 1 FA.
- prosecuting D, contrary to assurance she would not be prosecuted, unlikely to be abuse of process unless (i) the assurance was unequivocal and (ii) D acted upon it to her detriment.
- P not bound by letter telling D she would not be prosecuted when letter sent without P’s knowledge or authority.
undefined: unpaid